Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Bye! Thanks For Reading!

We really hope that you have enjoyed reading our blog as much as we enjoyed writing it!  The topic of popular culture was really interesting to write about especially because its something that we experience everyday in music, movies, tv and books.  We hope that our topics have opened your eyes to different issues and topics going on in our populate culture.  We have explored different gender stereotypes in movies and novels, the coming out of rock musicians, and the presence of sex in all pop culture.  We really hope you were able to take away something from our blog, we as a group, each took a little something different from this blog.  Thanks for reading and all of your comments! :)

Monday, April 22, 2013

Shine the rainbow spot light

When women make a statement in the music industry, they are called Divas and power houses. When  straight men become popular they are give titles like king of... or sexy bad boy and things of that nature. but what happens when your in between the two. Gay men have the hardest time in the music in the music industry because their hasn't be a place set for them quite yet. However just because we haven't officially said  this is " the genre for gays" doesn't mean they haven't made their own impact on popular music, including rock and roll. In the article "Between Decadence and Denial: Two Studies in Gay Male Politics and 1980s Pop Music", they point out that in the 1980's was when most popular music looked very gay."In a decade that was supposed to have been dominated by conservative national politics and the rise of the straight-laced power-lunching yuppie, the world of popular music in the 1980s looked awfully gay. Bands like Erasure, Depeche Mode, Soft Cell, and the Bronski Beat made it to the top of the US pop charts with self-proclaimed, sometimes flamboyantly gay members. Professed heterosexuals like George Michael, Prince, Michael Jackson, and Madonna challenged established codes of sexual conduct by adopting fashions and styles long associated with the gay community".  


Another misconception is that many people think that gay men in general are weak because they often imitate girls. However this is not the case. There are many rock bands such as " Extra Fancy", who had to have a independent label because it wasn't that they were gay it was that they weren't the stereotypical gay males so they didn't no how to sell their music. So the boys had to make their own place in the music industry, so that they could sing and speak freely about what they believed in. "In 1996 Atlantic Records released and almost instantly abandoned an album that asserted a uniquely aggressive, macho gay male identity. The songs of Extra Fancy's Sinnerman deal with sadomasochism, violent retribution against gay-bashers, and life with HIV in a punk-inflected style that musically reflects the intense aggression of their texts. Extra Fancy first released Sinnerman on the independent label Diablo Musica, but Atlantic immediately picked it up, hoping to use it as a catalyst for their new gay marketing division. Eight weeks later the band, along with the division, was dropped". 

In conclusion gay men are just as much hard core and just as much a diva as any other person in the music industry. Music is about expressing yourself and making people listen to what you have to say. Therefore there should be no limit on what you sing or rap about because all of these taboo subjects need to come to light so tat people can stop being ignorant to the world and what's going on around them.

                                                       citation
Schwandt, Kevin. "The erotics of an oil drum: queercore, gay macho, and the defiant sexuality of Extra Fancy's Sinnerman." Women & Music 13 (2009): 76+. Academic OneFile. Web. 22 Apr. 2013.

  1.  Lecklider, Aaron "
  2. Between Decadence and Denial: Two Studies in Gay Male Politics and 1980s Pop Music." Journal of Popular Music Studies Vol. 16pages 111–141, August 2004


Wednesday, April 17, 2013

gender roles in disney movies...

How many of you knew that we were being stereotyped about our gender since we were little and watching disney channel. Disney channel has many stereotypes about gender with the different movies about princesses and masculine men.
this picture shows how we were stereotyped as kids in believeing that this is how men are supposed to be. All men are supposed to be strong and not fearful of anything.
this picture shows how all girls dream of being when they get older. Everygirl grows up wanting to be a princess because of the stereotypes that this is how girls are supposed to be very well kept together, pretty dresses, and hair and makeup.
 
 
shayla weems

Monday, April 15, 2013

Mr. Diva

Adam Lambert is mostly known for being runner up in the eighth season of american idol. He is also homosexual. Adam considers his self to be a Diva and has the attitude to back it up as you can see in this video. he extravagant clothing and risky performances often stir up a lot of talk in the media about his sexuality  however in the interview below he addresses the "issue" by saying that he was comfortable being gay and he didn't come out on American Idol because he was never in.

Friday, April 5, 2013

Oh...It's One Of THOSE Books...

"Once I learned, I went online and ordered every romance novel I could find.  They're fairy tales for grown-ups." - Gena Showalter, author of The Darkest Night


If you've ever read a romance novel, you've most likely have heard this a lot from people "Oh you're reading one of those books?"  In fact, I personally heard it just last weekend as I was sitting on the couch reading Fifty Shades of Grey, and then my dad proceeded to go on about how it was "smut".  This is the common stereotype of not only romance books themselves but also of the women who read them.  Despite the fact that romance fiction had "$1.37 billion in sales in 2006 and one third of all women who read, read romance" (Lee 52).  And that's just in 2006, the number has most likely increased tremendously as the popularity of romance novels increases.  Often times, these stereotypes of romance novels comes from the idea that they are all the same, that romance novels have no content, that unintelligent woman read these books, but where did all these notions come from?


The video posted gives some reasons behind these stereotypes; describing reading romance novels as a "revolution".  Those reasons might have been back then, but as the video asks, is reading romance still a revolution?  Women, yes, are still boggled down it seems by gender roles including the most prominent now a days, nonworking mothers, but are we really still at the same level of marrying for money?  Escaping the house?  Today, if you want a career it's much more acceptable to go to school and get one.  Whether you'll have the same rights in that career as your male coworker is a different story.  However, I agree with the notions that a heroine of a romance novel chooses her life and her love, which was a big deal for when these novels were first being written.  Back then, women didn't have any choices, they had to live the life that was decided by then by the men in their life.  Romance novels gave women the chance to read and write about a life that was different, one that they got to choose.

Most people, it seems, are quick to judge what a romance is but they don't understand what exactly constitutes a romance novel.  The video gives the definition of "a story of two people falling in love, overcoming obstacles, and living happily ever after".  But really, there is much more to a romance novel than just a love story.  The romance novel can be broken down into two categories; soft romance and strong romance. Now it's not hard to decipher what the two could possibly be; the soft represents the archetypal romance with a heroine that is more of damsel in distress rather than hero and the strong represents a heroine that is strong, confident, and resourceful.  (Owen 537).  Often times the covers of novels can be a good indicator of which is which.  For example, the soft romance usually shows the couple embracing, whereas the strong romance features the heroine in the forefront with the man in the background, like the examples I have shown above.  Now, they can be broken down again into sub genres like contemporary, historical, regency, western, inspiration, romantic suspense and paranormal (Um, Twilight, anyone?) and that each sub genre contains its own set of formulas, conventions, motifs, and generic expectations (Lee 53).

The romance genre has been around for generations but gained attention when in the 1970's, the historical romances, who often displayed covers of half naked men and women with their boobs hanging out, got the term "bodice-rippers" which came to represent the entire romance genre.  The bodice - rippers "were used to justify dismissing this 'trivial' form of women's fiction as naturalizing sexual violence against passive, naive, women through rape fantasies and other sexual brutalities" (Lee 55).  The historical setting of these romance novels allowed women to enjoy the rape fantasy without confusing it with actual, dangerous, real-life rape.  However, in the 1980's, the rape fantasy was replaced with stronger, sexually active, heroines that enjoyed their sexual encounters.  This new era of romance fiction brought on the term "romantica"which was a combination of both romance and erotica, these books were often more sexually explicit, included more graphic language, and the characters often engaged in difficult or controversial sexual situations.  A perfect example of this is Fifty Shades of Grey with it's BDSM sex.  Often times, yes, romance novels have a basic format to their plot described as follows: "young girl meets older dominant male.  She is attracted, yet frightened.  They become entangled in a relationship in which she feels he dislikes her but in the end after varying degrees of plot complication she finds he loves her" (Owen 538), but romance novels represent so much more than just a woman falling in love.

Romance novels, instead of giving women a choice as they once did, now give women a chance to escape their everyday lives.  "In contemporary culture, the erotic popular romance novel serves the function once filled by the fairy tale.  Fairy tales have been interpreted as encapsulating collective fantasies and providing a way for women to subvert and resist patriarchal norms" (Lee 62).  All fiction novels, not just romance, are supposed to provide an escape from everyday life, I know that's why I read them.  Often times, this fact is overlooked in the critic of romance novels, they aren't meant to be real life, if they were they'd be non-fiction.  Once upon a time, fairy tales, which were intended not just for children but also adults, gave us a way to escape to magical places.  Now, this purpose is given to us by romance novels.  In the novel, Liar of the Lion, written by Christine Feehan, the story of Beauty and the Beast is re-written into something dark and sexual.  The novel begins with it's main character Isabella Vernaducci going alone to a strange castle whose owner is a mysterious man that no one knows about in exchange to set her brother free; very similar to the original Beauty and the Beast story. However, when Isabella sees Nicolai, the owner of the mansion, she does not see him as the beast but as a man.  Every encounter between Isabella and Nicolai creates heat and tension between the two characters, but it isn't until they finally engage in sex that Isabella sees him momentarily appear as a lion.  At the end of novel, Isabella sees Nicolai as being truly a man and as Nicolai declares his love for her, the curse is broken.  The romance novel often does this in the sense that "the domineering male becomes the catalyst that makes the empowerment fantasy work" (Lee 56) and "the confrontations between strong heroes and heroines -which are ultimately always won by the heroines of these novels - results in 'taming' the hero" (Lee 61).  Whether they are literally taming the heros as in Liar of the Lion or even in Twilight, or figuratively as in Fifty Shades Darker, where (spoiler alert!) Christian agrees to have a non-BDSM relationship and try for a standard girlfriend boyfriend relationship, the female is gaining power and knowledge from the male heros of the story.

It's true that romance novels are about the declaration of love, especially from the heroes, however its also about what that declaration gives the women.  These stories aren't just love stories, they're stories about power and relationship.  As I said above, the man is not domesticated by marriage, instead he is "tamed" by the woman.  Especially in the strong romance novels, these stories are more about female empowerment than anything else.  "If we reposition the conflict in romance novels from the quest of a love that conquers all to a struggle for power through knowledge of the other, it becomes possible to read these novels also as fantasies of female empowerment" (Lee 62).  Now, the extent to which the heroine exercise her new found power differs based on sub-genre, novel, author, and story.  Again, in Fifty Shades Darker, our heroine Anastasia learns a lot about Christian's family and past which she uses to get closer to him.
Romance novels are a lot more than just a silly love story or "mommy porn", they are stories of female power, stability, and a way to escape; romance "stories are about both the 'sentimental and sensual delights of love' and the 'forbidden pleasures of revenge and appropriation'" (Lee 61).  So the next time you see someone reading Nicholas Sparks or E.L. James, before you judge, just remember that romance novels are so much more than what you think.


-Liz Harrison

Work Cited
Lee, Linda J. "Guilty Pleasures: Reading Romance Novels as Reworked Fiary Tales." Marvels &
Tales 22.1 (2008): 52-66. Print.

Owen, Mairead.  "Re-Inventing Romance: Reading Popular Romantic Fiction." Women's Studies International Forum 20.4 (1997): 537-546. Print.

Monday, April 1, 2013

sex in movies.....doesnt everyone love that

 "How Gender's Got Us All Tied Up, a Debra Chasnoff documentary (2009), explores the pressures surrounding issues of gender and sexuality in the lives of American teens. This film includes interviews from more than 50 high school students from across the country sharing their thoughts, ideas, and experiences regarding gender roles and issues of sexual identity development" (Reisschmidt, 2009). This film talks about the stereotypes and gender labeling on individuals because of their appearance and body image. This documentary is said to be a great way for parents, teachers,a dn even school psychologist to explore the issue of diversity, and the different views that students have on this issue.
The availability to watch pornography has increased alot over the years and children are sarting to watch it at younger and younger ages. "Adolescence and early adulthood is a time for exploring and discovering sexuality, both alone and with others. There is, however, a fear that young people do not have the opportunity to do this in a manner that is comfortable and developmentally appropriate for them. Because of the widespread availability of pornography in the media, youths are exposed to violent or bizarre sexual activities long before they have had any personal sexual experiences" (Gudrun et al., 2006). Kids who are exposed to pornography before there parents have a chance to talk to them about sex are sometimes confused on the topic because parents make it seem like sex is so wrong but pornography makes it look interesting and something you should try.

                                                              Resources

Wallmyr, G., & Welin, C. (2006). Young people, pornography, and sexuality: Sources and attitudes. The Journal of School Nursing, 22(5), 290-5. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.emich.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/213112016?accountid=10650

Reisschmidt, Amanda. "A Documentary on Gender and Sexuality." Communique Oct. 2011: 38.  Academic OneFile. Web. 1 Apr. 2013.
shayla weems